John 18: does the-God answer to Bible prediction?
[I
comprehend Genesis 1:28, in Jesus’s perspective, to suggest that, while God
offers appreciation and Jesus offers peace, male human-being unites to female
and the unit provides safety& security to the living species and to the
earth. Every person can& may accept the safety& security duty, which I
call Genesis-1 “responsible-human-independence” or RHI. I read Bible passages with
Genesis-RHI perspective.]
18 When he had finished praying, Jesus left with
his disciples and crossed the Kidron Valley. On the other side there was a
garden, and he and his disciples went into it.
2 Now Judas, who betrayed him, knew the place,
because Jesus had often met there with his disciples. 3 So
Judas came to the garden, guiding a detachment of soldiers and some
officials from the chief priests and the Pharisees. They were carrying
torches, lanterns and weapons. [Rabbis and the national guard.]
4 Jesus, knowing all that was going to happen to
him, went out and asked them, “Who is it you want?” [Jesus expressing leadership.]
5 “Jesus of Nazareth,” they replied.
“I am he,” Jesus
said. (And Judas the traitor was standing there with them.) 6 When
Jesus said, “I am he,” they drew back and fell to the ground.
7 Again he asked them, “Who is it you want?”
“Jesus of Nazareth,”
they said.
8 Jesus answered, “I told you that I am he.
If you are looking for me, then let these men go.” 9 This
happened so that the words he had spoken would be fulfilled: “I have not
lost one of those you gave me.” [This John quoting John. I don’t trust John; John 18:9 John
6:39. Nevertheless, I consider Jesus reliable, primarily because I glean civic-integrity
from his independent thought.]
10 Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it and
struck the high priest’s servant, cutting off his right ear. (The servant’s
name was Malchus.)
11 Jesus commanded Peter, “Put your sword
away! Shall I not drink the cup the Father has given me?” [This is Catholic doctrine; did
Jesus actually say that? If so, was he representing his political philosophy more
than the-God?]
12 Then the detachment of soldiers with its
commander and the Jewish officials arrested Jesus. [What was the charge at the time of the arrest?]
They bound him 13 and brought him first to Annas,
who was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, the high priest that year. 14 Caiaphas
was the one who had advised the Jewish leaders that it would be good if one man
died for the people. [Really?
To what people and what benefit? Jews leaders claimed that Jesus was leading an
insurrection against Rome that would result in Rome punishing the Jewish
people: better to murder Jesus.]
Peter’s First Denial
15 Simon Peter and another disciple were following
Jesus. Because this disciple was known to the high priest, he went with
Jesus into the high priest’s courtyard, 16 but
Peter had to wait outside at the door. The other disciple [John competing against Peter?],
who was known to the high priest, came back, spoke to the servant girl on duty
there and brought Peter in.
17 “You aren’t one of this man’s disciples too, are
you?” she asked Peter.
He replied, “I am not.”
18 It was cold, and the servants and officials
stood around a fire they had made to keep warm. Peter also was standing
with them, warming himself.
The High Priest Questions Jesus
19 Meanwhile, the high priest questioned Jesus
about his disciples and his teaching.
20 “I have spoken openly to the world,” Jesus
replied. “I always taught in synagogues or at the temple, where
all the Jews come together. I said nothing in secret. 21 Why
question me? Ask those who heard me. Surely they know what I said.” [Why have Jesus refer to hearsay?
Does John accept that Jesus could lie . . . that his audience could be more
reliable?]
22 When Jesus said this, one of the
officials nearby slapped him in the face. “Is this the way you answer
the high priest?” he demanded.
23 “If I said something wrong,” Jesus
replied, “testify as to what is wrong. But if I spoke the truth, why did
you strike me?” [So far,
Jesus’ question seems strange.] 24 Then
Annas sent him bound to Caiaphas the high priest.
Peter’s Second and Third Denials
25 Meanwhile, Simon Peter was still standing there
warming himself. So they asked him, “You aren’t one of his disciples too,
are you?”
He denied it, saying, “I
am not.”
26 One of the high priest’s servants, a relative of
the man whose ear Peter had cut off, challenged him, “Didn’t I see you
with him in the garden?” 27 Again Peter denied it,
and at that moment a rooster began to crow. [This construct is too convenient to have impact on my
life: I don’t trust John.]
Jesus Before Pilate
28 Then the Jewish leaders took Jesus from Caiaphas
to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to
avoid ceremonial uncleanness they did not enter the palace, because they
wanted to be able to eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate
came out to them and asked, “What charges are you bringing against this man?”
30 “If he were not a criminal,” they replied, “we
would not have handed him over to you.”
31 Pilate said, “Take him yourselves and judge him
by your own law.”
“But we have no right to
execute anyone,” they objected. 32 This took place
to fulfill what Jesus had said about the kind of death he was going to die.
33 Pilate then went back inside the
palace, summoned Jesus and asked him, “Are you the king of the Jews?”
34 “Is that your own idea,” Jesus asked, “or
did others talk to you about me?”
35 “Am I a Jew?” Pilate replied. “Your own people
and chief priests handed you over to me. What is it you have done?”
36 Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this
world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish
leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.” [I don’t believe Jesus would
call his followers “servants”. I do not believe he would cite “another place”.
His leadership and advice was for living, not for death. Jesus affirmed Genesis
1:28: humankind is independently responsible for safety on earth, and so
advised people he persuaded.]
[Plato’s record of Socrates’ trial and execution presages some elements of the Biblical Jesus story: unjust accusation and conviction, friends to rescue Socrates if he would agree, and false witnesses in the jury. Socrates chose death instead of exile. Socrates died to uphold the-rule-of-law, even when adjudication fails.]
37 “You are a king, then!” said Pilate.
Jesus answered, “You
say that I am a king. In fact, the reason I was born and came into the world is
to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.”
38 “What is truth?” retorted Pilate. With this he
went out again to the Jews gathered there and said, “I find no basis for a
charge against him. [At
this point, Pilate, in the-God’s image and in the interest of statutory justice
would not have killed Jesus. To say that he had to kill Jesus to fulfill
the-God’s plan is a construct I do not accept. The-God could have handled Pilot
delivering justice in the-God’s image.] 39 But
it is your custom for me to release to you one prisoner at the time of the Passover.
Do you want me to release ‘the king of the Jews’?”
40 They shouted back, “No, not him! Give us
Barabbas!” Now Barabbas had taken part in an uprising. [Mark 15:7 says he was imprisoned with insurrectionist
who had committed murder. Perhaps an uprising against Rome, but not by the
influential Jesus; in other words, not reflecting on the Jewish people, as
Jesus did.]
[In this story, the truth is that Pilate failed Jesus’
suggestions, such as, render unto Caesar, be perfect, appreciation existed
before Abraham was born, and more. Pilate killed an innocent man, in order to
to partner with the clergy and religious elites.
Each human being who considers this story has a choice:
Believe Jesus’ independence, or believe the Church’s construct. We don’t know
the-ineluctable-truth, where “ineluctable” means “not to be avoided, changed,
or resisted”. Each of us has only reason with which to make our choice. I
choose Jesus’s message and assert that the-God could have managed without the crucifixion
of Jesus. The Church is no different from us:
It is important to them to maintain humility toward the-God.
I don’t want anyone to think as I do; rather let them
think as they do. However, I do not encourage anyone to think I can advocate a
Jesus that differs from the one that influences my person, regardless of my
distrust of John and other writers who reported decades after Jesus died.
I think for the first time in my life I am in another
place where that is possible: today’s UBC, enhanced to me by Nomads class, at
least. (The other place is with my family.)]
No comments:
Post a Comment