Guide: NKJV New Testament, online, emphasis in bold or Old Testament from chabad.org, text I emphasize in green; CJB in magenta; chabad.org Hebrew Bible in olive. footnotes to NKJV in superscript sky blue , discussion in yellow; and my comments in gray. I may use endnotes to cite outside literature or extensive comment.
Using AI, Search Assist for
discussion with me; my statement the SA’s response:
A.
Genesis
1:26 improves Sumerian philosophy if goodness is a surrogate for God. SA: “Genesis
1:26 presents humanity as created in the image of God, emphasizing a unique
relationship between humans and the divine, which contrasts with Sumerian views
that often depicted gods as distant and capricious. This biblical perspective
elevates the concept of goodness, suggesting that humans reflect divine
qualities and have a purposeful role in creation, thus offering a more positive
and relational understanding of divinity compared to Sumerian philosophy.”
B.
Genesis
1:26 informs that on earth, persons may choose goodness.
SA: “Genesis 1:26 indicates that
humans are created in God's image and are given the responsibility to rule over
the earth, which includes the ability to choose between good and evil. This
choice reflects their unique role and dignity as representatives of God in
creation.”
C.
Genesis 1:26 means each person
has the power, authority, and responsibility to order the earth.
SA:
“Genesis 1:26 indicates that humans are created in God's image and are
given dominion over the earth, which means they have the power and
responsibility to manage and care for creation. This dominion is meant to
reflect God's character, emphasizing stewardship rather than exploitation.”
Key opinions:
I write opinion, in order to facilitate listening to
others, because I do not know the ineluctable truth. I think the Bible suggests
goodness-which-motivates-good-behavior.
Key verses:
1.
V1-11, reminding elite Jews of the Tanakh.
a.
In particular, the importance of the God’s emissary on
earth, the Lord.
b.
Injustice by workers toward their benefactor seems a
metaphor for Yeshua’s leaders’ behavior.
c.
Yeshua speaks of badness to encourage goodness.
d.
V12 the elites sense the crowd’s awareness of
hypocrisy, so withdraw.
2.
V13-17 Yeshua informs antagonists to aid Caesar’s
civil order.
a.
Without civil order, personal opportunity cannot
flourish
3.
V18-27 Yeshua informs that the resurrected are like
angles in heaven but the God is God to the living, as recorded for the
patriarchs.
a.
Together, these thoughts imply that a physical person
who accepts God during life has life in the afterdeath.
b.
However, life afterdeath does not reflect physical
commitments like marriage.
4.
V28-34 Yeshua told the scribe he was not far from the
kingdom of God, which he had established in V27 is the kingdom of the living.
a.
“Not far from” implies nearly pure acceptance of God,
rather than impending death.
b.
I think extrapolation of this passage to claim that
reaching perfection before the God portends death is erroneous.
i.
Living people may and can pursue perfect behavior.
c.
Love as competition with whole burnt offerings and
sacrifices makes love a quid pro quo object.
i.
I prefer to accept, appreciate, and mimic goodness.
ii.
I appreciate whatever constrains the consequence of
human choice and look to experience and observations for guidance.
1.
For example, harm invites loss.
d.
Blanket love for neighbor either precludes
consideration of badness or makes resistance to badness an act of love.
5.
V35-37 has Yeshua asking, before Pilate executed him,
about the Messiah.
6.
V38-44 has Yeshua approving of “the treasury”
accepting sacrifice from the weak, a show of arrogance toward Sumerian law 4100
years ago.
a.
I do not think Yeshua approved sacrifice, especially
from the weak.
The
Text: Mark 12 NKJV
The Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers[tenant farmers]
12:1 Then He
began to speak to them[in the temple, the chief priests, the
scribes, and the elders] in parables: “A man
planted a vineyard and set a hedge around it, dug a
place for the wine vat and built a tower. And he leased it to vinedressers
and went into a far country. 2 Now at
vintage-time he sent a servant to the vinedressers, that he might receive some
of the fruit of the vineyard from the vinedressers. 3 And they
took him and beat him and sent him away
empty-handed. 4 Again he sent them
another servant, and at him they threw stones, wounded him in
the head, and sent him away shamefully treated. 5 And again
he sent another, and him they killed; and many others, beating
some and killing some. 6 Therefore
still having one son, his beloved, he also sent him to them last, saying, ‘They
will respect my son.’ 7 But those vinedressers said among themselves, ‘This is
the heir. Come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.’ 8 So they
took him and killed him and cast him out of
the vineyard.
9 “Therefore
what will the owner of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy the
vinedressers, and give the vineyard to others. 10 Have you
not even read this Scripture:
‘The
stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone.
11 This was
the Lord’s doing,
And it is marvelous in our eyes’?” [Psalm
118:22]
12 And they
sought to lay hands on Him, but feared the multitude, for they knew He had
spoken the parable against them. So they left Him and went away.
The Pharisees: Is It Lawful to Pay Taxes to Caesar?
13 Then they sent to Him some of the Pharisees [The Pharisees were
a prominent Jewish sect and philosophical school
during, active from roughly the mid-second century BCE until the destruction of
the Temple in 70 CE, characterized by their rigorous interpretation of the Mosaic
Law through an oral tradition believed to
have been transmitted alongside the written Torah, and their
advocacy for doctrines including the resurrection of the dead,
angelic intervention, and a balance between divine
providence and human free
will.] and the Herodians [The Herodians were
a Jewish political faction active in first-century AD Judea and Galilee that
favored the continuation of rule by the Herodian dynasty under Roman imperial
oversight, viewing it as essential for national stability and order.[1] Primarily
attested in the New Testament Gospels, they appear as collaborators with the
Pharisees—despite ideological tensions between the pro-Roman Herodians and the
more nationalist Pharisees—in plots to eliminate Jesus of Nazareth, including
after his Sabbath healing (Mark 3:6) and in the entrapment question regarding
tribute to Caesar (Mark 12:13; Matthew 22:16).[1] Jesus himself
critiqued their influence, warning his disciples against the "leaven"
of Herod (Mark 8:15), interpreted by scholars as a caution against their
accommodationist politics and perceived hypocrisy.[1] This unlikely
alliance underscores the Herodians' pragmatic prioritization of Herodian
authority, often aligned with Roman interests, over strict Torah observance or
messianic expectations that threatened the status quo. Their prominence
reflects the fragmented political landscape of Herod Antipas's tetrarchy (r. 4
BC–AD 39), where factional maneuvering amid Roman client kingship shaped Jewish
responses to emerging religious movements.[1]], to catch Him in His words. 14 When
they had come, they said to Him, “Teacher, we know that You are true, and [d]care about no one; for You do
not [e]regard the person of men [Court no man’s
favor], but teach the way of God
in truth. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not? 15 Shall
we pay, or shall we not pay?”
But He, knowing their hypocrisy, said to them, “Why do
you test Me? Bring Me a denarius that I may see it.” 16 So
they brought it.
And He said to them, “Whose image and
inscription is this?” They said to Him, “Caesar’s.”
17 And
Jesus answered and said to them, “Render [pay] to Caesar the
things that are Caesar’s, and to God the
things that are God’s.”
And they marveled at Him.
The Sadducees: What About the Resurrection?
18 Then some Sadducees
[The Sadducees
(Hebrew: צְדוֹקִים; Greek: Σαδδουκαῖοι) were an ancient Jewish sect active from
approximately the 2nd century BCE until the
destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, primarily drawn from priestly,
aristocratic, and military elites who emphasized strict
adherence to the written Torah while
rejecting oral traditions, the resurrection of the dead,
angels, spirits, and predestined fate in favor of human free
will. Their name likely derives from Zadok, the high priest
under Solomon, reflecting ties to hereditary
priestly lineages that positioned them as custodians of Temple worship in Jerusalem.], who say there is no resurrection,
came to Him; and they asked Him, saying: 19 “Teacher, Moses
wrote to us that if a man’s brother dies, and leaves his wife
behind, and leaves no children, his brother should take his wife and raise up offspring
for his brother. 20 Now there were seven brothers.
The first took a wife; and dying, he left no offspring. 21 And
the second took her, and he died; nor did he leave any offspring. And the third
likewise. 22 So the seven had her and left no
offspring. Last of all the woman died also. 23 Therefore,
in the resurrection,
when they rise, whose wife will she be? For all seven had her as wife.”
24 Jesus
answered and said to them, “Are you not therefore [g]mistaken, because you do not know the
Scriptures nor the power of God? 25 For when
they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 26 But
concerning the dead, that they rise, have you not read in the book of Moses, in
the burning bush passage, how God spoke to
him, saying, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and
the God of Jacob’? 27 He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living. You are
therefore greatly mistaken [Or deceived].”
The Scribes: Which Is the First Commandment of All?
28 Then one
of the scribes [Tanakh writers and teachers] came, and having heard
them reasoning together, perceiving [seeing] that He had answered them well, asked
Him, “Which is the first [foremost] commandment of all?”
29 Jesus
answered him, “The first of all the commandments is: ‘Hear, O
Israel, the Lord our
God, the Lord is
one. 30 And you shall love
the Lord your God with all
your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your
strength.’ This is the first commandment. 31 And the
second, like it, is this: ‘You
shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater
than these.”
32 So the
scribe said to Him, “Well said, Teacher. You have spoken the
truth, for there is one God, and there is no other but He. 33 And
to love Him with all the heart, with all the understanding, with all the
soul, and with all the strength, and to love one’s neighbor as oneself, is
more than all the whole burnt
offerings and sacrifices.”
34 Now when
Jesus saw that he answered wisely, He said to him, “You are
not far from the kingdom of God.”
But after that no one dared question Him.
Jesus: How Can David Call His Descendant Lord?
35 Then
Jesus answered and said, while He taught in the temple, “How is
it that the scribes say that the Christ [Messiah] is the Son of David? 36 For David
himself said by the Holy Spirit:
‘The Lord said to my Lord,
“Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.” ’
37 Therefore
David himself calls Him ‘Lord’; how is He then his Son?”
And the common people heard Him gladly.
Beware of the Scribes
38 Then He said to them in His teaching, “Beware of the scribes, who desire to go around in long robes, love greetings in the marketplaces, 39 the best seats in the synagogues,
and the best places at feasts, 40 who devour
widows’ houses [Ur-Nammu’s
law code, 4100 years ago, warned the strong not to take advantage of the weak.],
and for a
pretense for appearance’ sake] make long prayers. These will receive greater condemnation.”
The Widow’s Two Mites
41 Now
Jesus sat opposite the treasury and saw how the people put money into the
treasury. And many who were rich put in much. 42 Then
one poor widow came and threw in two mites [Gr. lepta, very
small copper coins], which make a quadrans[A Roman coin]. 43 So
He called His disciples to Himself and said to them, “Assuredly,
I say to you that this poor widow has put in more than all those who have given to
the treasury; 44 for they all put in out
of their abundance, but she
out of her poverty put in all that she had, her whole livelihood.”