Friday, January 14, 2022

Avoiding Gideon-story's civic-mistakes: Judges 6-8

Note: I read the Bible to consider whether a specific passage comports to my weak-comprehension of the perhaps 5,000-year-old Sumerian philosophy expressed by Hebrew scholars 3,000 years ago in Genesis 1:28:  Female& male-human-being can& may, independent of other entities, constrain political chaos on earth. I think the next Bible canon should include the law codes of Sumer.

I perceive that the 10,000-year-old Sumer civilization ought to be considered, in order to increase civic-integrity while appreciating private spiritual pursuits in 2022 and beyond.

Judges

The author has Gideon blaming the-God for erroneous personal ambitions

I object to the Gideon story, in appreciating Genesis 1:28’s message: constrain chaos in your way of living. I use “the-God” to express the source and suggest an improvement herein: .

Recall that so far, in 300,000 years homo-sapiens development (through the year 2022), the following evidences suggest the-ineluctable-truth, most of which is not known:

1)    No culture has attempted to follow the 5500 year-old Genesis-1 advice from Sumer: human-being can& may constrain chaos in both individual& group lifestyles and thus to living human-being and to posterity.

2)    The Old Testament scheme: to discover a God that will usurp the Genesis-1 choice:

a)    Attribute individual/group ambition to the-God. In other words, “blame” the-God for un-civic motives.

b)   Persuade the-God to strategy& power under individual/group goals.

i)     Barter each: sacrifice, worship, praise, & prayer.

ii)    Impose supernatural reports so that the-God’s hand is publically perceived.

c)    Publically pretend that the-God usurped individual/group ambitions.

i)     Ridicule the opponent by claiming they follow a false god.

ii)    Claim the loser (e.g., in battle/debate) can never recover/return.

d)   Parlay attribution of individual/group success to the-God.

e)    Enjoy the fruits of victory, regardless of the-God.

f)     Accept personal/group satisfaction using high political skill.

g)   Shamelessly return to old habits and past idols.

3)    Civic-citizens may learn from Gideon’s privations:

a)    Gideon (not privy to the Internet) never received Jesus’ message that Gideon is a god-facing-death.[1]

i)     Doubted/feared himself.

ii)    Doubted/feared his origins.

iii)   Feared the future.

4)    Gideon focused on temporal needs without time& work for self-perfection in the-God’s image.[2]

a)    Did not appreciate fellow-citizens and their civically-good contributions.

b)   Did not appreciate physic& its-progeny; looked to mystery (metaphysics).

c)    Looked to cultural doctrine for guidance.

i)     Recalled doctrinal successes.

ii)    Overlooked doctrinal failures.

Conclusion

1)    So far, Christianity seems to conflate salvation of the soul& civic order.

a)    Human-kind mostly seeks the-good with assurance of benefits.

b)   Perhaps there’s an achievable better future by separation of intentions:

i)     For death, accept the salvation Jesus provides rather than a doctrine.

ii)    For life, practice the responsible-human-independence necessity& justice demand.

(1)  Consider that Jesus claimed presence at the origins of Genesis 1.

(2)  Accept that the-world’s-good-citizens appreciate Jesus as a good civic influencer and peacemaker who demands personal choice to every human-being.

iii)   Among Christians, Baptists have a special opportunity to lessen 2022 divergent chaos.

(1)  Confident, independent pursuit of the-good that is implied in the Bible and subsequent history.

(2)  Humility toward each believer’s potential to improve interpretation.

(3)  Appreciation& humility to whatever-controls-the-consequence-of-personal-choice.

(a)  The source of the laws of physics& its progeny, including fiction.

(b)  The above wieldy phrase, perhaps supplants the suggestion “the-God”, proposed to distinguish from “God”.

2)    The discussion is important: “the-ineluctable-truth”, during 2006 to 2021 emerged as worthy for conversation.

a)    Then, the 400 year hiding of “ineluctable” seemed evident.

b)   And both “ineluctable truth” and “the ineluctable truth” were published in 1906. But our educators did not share it with us.

3)    Potential to recall past error, in order to aid reform to civic-integrity, trusting the-ineluctable-truth -- Jesus, God, chance, or whatever-accommodates-private-choice for salvation, while practicing RHI.

a)    I choose to participate in development of the-metaphysical-Jesus for civic-integrity among human-beings and cannot pray for salvation of my soul.

b)   I pray to Jesus to save Cynthia’s soul, collaborating her hope& comfort.

4)    I think whatever-controls-the-consequence-of-personal-choice judges my person.

Following are my comments after studying Judges 6 – 8.

Introduction

Considering Judges 6-8, Gideon’s story, encouraged appreciation for Genesis 1:28 a 5,500 year-old message that civilizations ignored throughout& beyond the Bible unto 2022 chaos. Civic-citizens can lead 2022 reform in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and in the USA. We, the-good-People of the entity We the People of the United States, vainly look to higher power to usurp our responsibility for necessity& justice in civic integrity: responsible-human-independence (RHI).

Miscellaneous background (with highlight) about non-Israel tribes (a majority of the 12 might justify "Israelites", but this story involves a minority)

·         We understand Samuel (d. 1012 BCE) wrote the book of Judges.

·         The “300 Spartans” at Thermopile happened in 480 BC. It seems there were 4,000 allies with the Spartans.

·         Abraham and Keturah (after Sara and Hagar both died) conceived Midian as well as Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Ishbak, and Shuah.[3]

·         Gideon was the son of Joash, from the Abiezrite clan, the weakest in the tribe of Manasseh (first of 12 tribes of Israel) and lived in Ephra (Ophrah).

·         Amalek was the son of Eliphaz(himself the son of Esau, ancestor of the Edomites) and Eliphaz's concubine Timna was a Horite and sister of Lotan.

·         Amorites refer to highland mountaineers who inhabited the land of Canaan, described in Genesis as descendants of Canaan, the son of Ham, son of Noah, generations older than Abraham.

·         Asherah pole: pagan homage to the Ugaritic mother goddess Asherah. Ugarit was an ancient city port in northern Syria. Expressions were in cuneiform.

Gideon, vaunted as he may be through Bible distribution to hotel rooms, "heroes" a story of brutality upon invading the land of an existing civilization and killing the invaded peoples, at least the men. It’s all done in the name of the Lord God (except not in the NIV text), with negotiation for miracles. And for the Lord to punish a few of the 12 tribes of Israel for worshipping false gods. I perceive no success in this story.

I assert that ancient human-being needed the power of the Internet to discover Genesis 1:28’s necessity& justice directive: human-being can& may independently provide peace on Earth. I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth and think focusing on Genesis 1:28 and the-objective-truth, when the-ineluctable-truth is yet undiscovered, will serve a successful human life. Each individual may civically pursue the-good humankind can glean from the metaphysical Jesus, with or without the spiritually-saving body& blood of Jesus. Already, many non-Christian people appreciate Jesus’ leadership to the-civic-good. Baptists, due to their individual priesthoods can promote the metaphysical Jesus for civic necessity& justice as well as trust-in& expect a spiritually-favored afterdeath.[4]

Comments by Chapter and Verse

In Chapter 6, the author bemuses the reader with different entities: “angel”, “lord”, “the Lord”, and “God”, each in dialogues with Gideon. There are many ways to excuse these and other problems with the “God’s word” writing.

6:1 Perhaps the scholars exaggerate by calling Gideon’s Abiezerite clan (the weakest in the tribe of Manasseh) “the Israelites”.

6:2-7 The Abiezerites perceived insufficient strength to defeat the tribes they were invading, so they sought supernatural power as claimed earlier Bible stories.

6:8-12 First, a prophet spoke to the tribe, then an angel spoke to Gideon, calling him “mighty warrior” (so the writer says).

6:13-24 Gideon addresses the angel, as “lord”, that he is weak, but the response is reported as from “Lord”. The Lord promises to murder all the Midianites. However, Gideon negotiates a sacrifice as proof that the murders would take place. The angel instructs Gideon about the sacrifice, and Gideon fears death after seeing the angel’s face. But the Lord promised peace despite the glance.

6:25-32 Then the Lord instructs Gideon to sacrifice a bull and tear down the Amorite alter. Gideon does so at night, due to fear of his own tribe. The Abiezerites demanded to execute Gideon, then his father, Joash shamed the Abiezerites for worshipping Baal. Joash argued that Baal should be able to deal with Gideon.

6:33-40 All the Caananites gathered in the Valley of Jezreel. Gideon summoned the Abiezrites, the rest of Manasseh, Asher, Zebulun, and Naphtali to save Israel. Now, Gideon negotiates with God, and God seems to accommodate Gideon’s doubts.

7:1-8 The Lord felt there were too many soldiers with Gideon, and public opinion as to the Lord’s control would be lessened: the soldiers would feel they had won rather than the Lord winning for them.

Gideon said anyone who felt fear could leave Mount Gilead, so 22 thousand of 32 thousand soldiers departed. There were still too many, so the Lord selected some. The 300 who cupped their hands to drink water stayed; (I reason: any pestilence in the water bites a hand rather than a face. But why bother speculating about primitive caution in 2022? Better to think with discoveries through 2022.

 7:9-14 The Lord sent Gideon and his servant into the enemy camp, with camels numbered like “the sand on the seashore”. Gideon overheard an enemy’s dream and his colleague’s interpretation: warning of defeat at the hands of Gideon.

 7:15- Gideon took this as good news. He divided the troops into 3 companies of 100 each with torch in jars and trumpet. Thereby, they caused chaos among the many, who fled. The rest of the tribes chased the enemy. They captured two Midianite leaders, then cut-off their heads.

8:1-9 The Ephraimites were jealous and redressed Gideon. But Gideon opined that they were more productive so assigned the captured leaders to them. The 300 still chased Midianites and were tired and hungry. Local towns refused help, and Gideon swore to punish them.

8:10-21 The invaded-armies had been reduced from 135 thousand to 15 thousand. Gideon took the nomads route to surprise, pursue, and route them. He punished the towns that had not helped them, killing the men of Peniel. Gideon instructed his son to kill the Amorite princes, but the boy was too young, so Gideon did it.

8:22-27 The 4 tribes asked Gideon to offer 3 generations to rule them, and Gideon differed to the Lord. But Gideon asked for some gold. Gideon made an ephod (an instrument of priestly divination?), and it became a problem to his family.

8:28 The land had peace for 40 years. The tribes Gideon had led returned to Baal after Gideon died, forsaking the Lord and Gideon.

Only a dreamer would object to “God’s word” in this story. However, it is not possible for me to glean the-ineluctable-truth from it, so my opinion is that it can be ignored by civic-citizens, except to recall that it is not prudent to attribute personal thoughts to the-God or to that-which-controls-the-consequences-of-personal-choices. I am a dreamer and am pursuing my dream.


[1] John 10:34 referencing Psalm 82:6.

[2] Matthew 5:48.

[3] Online at conformingtojesus.com/charts-maps/en/genealogy_of_abraham.htm.

[4] This is a neology to represent the uncertainty of the indefinite time after body, mind, and person stop functioning. It admits that everlasting life is a mysterious hope (heaven) or fear (hell) rather than a certainty.

 


Thursday, December 30, 2021

Introduction to a civic plan

 

Hello, Nomads,

This is to introduce a plan for mutually sharing heartfelt United States thoughts stemming from the Bible then collaborating toward an achievable better-future. Nomads who participate will discover common words& phrases which traditionally mislead& divide human-beings. Participants will help replace dividers with expressions that relate to the-good citizen’s experiences& observations and motivate dependents to reform. For example, below, I suggest “appreciatively caution” to replace Old Testament (OT) instruction: "rebuke" a fellow-citizen. 

The collaborative-purpose is to establish the Genesis-1 civic-intentions reflected in the 1787 U.S. Constitution, responsible-human-independence (RHI), without lessening even one person’s spiritual well-being. I think UBC Baptists are best capable for this 2022-needed evolution. Consider the divergent chaos the U.S. has come to under Anglo-American tradition.

I promise:  Future messages will not attempt to cover as many issues as this one poses. Henceforth, I will post my study-essays on my blog, understandtheknowledge.blgospot.com and will also share posts by email. Please take time to comprehend this introduction; talk to me when you have questions/suggestions, and read blog messages that interest you. You can visit the blog in its new function anytime. I have moved previous posts to "archive" and will add to it posts I want to copyright to protect my opportunity to publish original ideas.

Let me review some key phrases I’ve used in class. On December 26, 2021, Kenneth finished his advent series on the fabulous four: fellowship, fear, forgiveness, and faith. When he asked for our faith-stories, I mentioned faith-in independent literature-study, including the Bible.

After 27 years’ self-directed study, I returned to UBC on October 17 to share with fellow-citizens a message:  Civic-citizens can& may benefit more from the-metaphysical-Jesus than from his body& blood. The consequence of my return is a flood of response, seen& unseen, informing me at an exhausting pace beyond Sunday morning class-time. That is, I maintain several other conversations that continually open my mind and my heart. I appreciate Phillip Chialastri, the manager at my auto mechanic shop for the events that led to my return to UBC. Recently, Charles "Chas" Kennon helped me perceive that Paul promoting understanding, as in Ephesians 1:8-10, addresses the-metaphysical-Jesus. Quoting, "With all wisdom and understanding, [God] made known . . . the mystery . . . to bring unity to all things in heaven and on earth under Christ."

I can now articulate what I mean by the-metaphysical-Jesus: the collective civic-integrity among considerate fellow-citizens, including Jesus, in evolution’s civic-journey to discover the-ineluctable-truth. We are at the leading-edge of 300,000 years’ homo sapiens’ psychological journey. Yet we discovered only about 5,500 years’ grammar to study. 

Please note “ineluctable” means: not to be avoided, changed, neglected, or resisted. Its usage empowers fellow-citizens to state “I don’t know the-ineluctable-truth”, when that is so. For example, to the question, “Will my soul live during my afterdeath?”, it’s prudent to say “I don’t know”. To the question, “Will my person live during my afterdeath?, the human-being is too powerful to pretend and can& may respond: “Each person’s death is ineluctable, yet their achievements live on”.

The civic-citizen neither compromises nor subjugates their personal-God, yet, in humility-to the-ineluctable-consequences-of-personal-choice, does not probe/question a fellow-citizen’s private spirituality. We see personal-accommodation regularly in Nomads and can share this civic-privacy with others.

I cannot solve the mystery of Jesus’s reported expression (“I shall lose none . . . he has given me”) and accept that no person, Jesus-contemporary or modern, can witness for Jesus. Yet, I think there is much to gain by considering reports-about-Jesus that seem validated by human-kind’s journey toward accepting the-ineluctable-truth. Progress can be journaled with a view to civic-integrity.

The recent literary-discovery that motivated my return to UBC is the perhaps 5,500 year old civic suggestion I glean from Genesis 1:28. With a view inspired by humankind’s technological progress (we plan to place a nuclear reactor on Mars within 15 years yet are in social chaos) we can& may reform civic-integrity.

So far, it seems humankind has ignored the Genesis-1 message, I think:  The species female&-male-human-being, each and together in the-God’s image, can& may provide order& prosperity to the lesser species and to the earth. So far, it seems humankind has both regressed order and increased chaos. For example, in Protestantism alone there are some 45,000 sects.

Returning to recent Nomads topics, Kenneth Tipton’s series that preceded the fabulous four included the Luke 17:1-19 spiritual formula: rebuke, await repentance, forgive, then expect to continually repeat the cycle. Sidelining my old policy, forgive& forget, I recently experienced the divisiveness of the parallel civic-formula: perceive wrong, rebuke, await repentance and if forthcoming, forgive (yet expect unlimited offense-repetition). That is to say, when I tried rebuke, I received silence, reminding me to forgive& forget. What the Old Testament taught and the New Testament mimicked makes no civic sense.

I reject the OT rebuke-suggestion and weak NT affirmation. I propose, under Genesis 1:28’s modern message, an alternative formula: appreciative caution, self-interested consideration& response, necessary& just reform, and mutual gratitude. In this mutually-appreciative process, the accuser, upon listening to the accused-person's view may discover ineluctable self-interest-reform. That is to say, the accuser may emerge surprised& grateful to reform a personal error. In other words, the accused may prove that the accuser is in error.

A plan for appreciative collaboration

In order to develop such deep thoughts without burdening Nomads, I re-dedicated my existing blog, understandtheknowledge.blogspot.com to journal reflections on Nomads-discussion, without copyright; your witness that words& phrases came from Nomads will be sufficient, along with the journal, to defend our future use of the ideas. If needed& wanted, we can add authors to the blog. Some members won’t have time or inclination to read the posts, and that is OK. I consider all of my communications an appeal to fellow-citizens to improve civic expressions, a clearly self-interested work. And the blog enables me to update posts for clarity and new perspectives.

Only a dreamer would think essays to develop a civic-glossary could improve this world; I am a dreamer. In my extreme dream, Nomads will induce UBC to accelerate an achievable better future. Beyond that, UBC may influence its Baptist-convention to join the evolution. UBC could form a team to journal, practice, facilitate, and encourage Genesis 1:28’s RHI or better. The blog’s name can be changed in order to accelerate essential reform. 

In the dreams’ dream, the U.S. will establish the 1787 U.S. Constitution’s intentions to fulfill Genesis 1:28: constrain chaos on earth. The intention stated in the preamble is 5 domestic disciplines --- integrity, justice, peace, strength, and prosperity, “in order to” practice, facilitate, and encourage RHI “to ourselves and our Posterity” including legal immigrants. Spirituality is not among the disciplines, in order to hold religious practices private rather than civil.

Vaughn Crombie convinced me to try UBCCourageClass, and I am participating while commenting on Nomads' scripture selections.

Phil

Updated on October 16, 2022

Leviticus 19:17-19, Matthew 18,& Luke 17: Appreciative caution, not rebuke

[Note: I read the Bible to consider whether a specific passage comports to my weak-comprehension of the perhaps 5,000-year-old Sumerian philosophy, expressed by Hebrew scholars 3,000 years ago in Genesis 1:28:  Female& male-human-being can& may, independent of other entities, constrain political chaos on earth. I think Genesis-1 suggests responsible-human-independence (RHI) and am interested in improving my opinion.

I think the next Bible canon should include the successive law codes of Sumer. I perceive that the 10,000-year-old Sumer civilization ought to be considered, in order to increase civic-integrity while appreciating private spiritual pursuits now and in the future.]

Appreciative-caution rather than rebuke

I arbitrarily reviewed Bible instruction, intending to reject the Biblical rebuke-cycle: perceive victimization, rebuke the accused, await their apology, and forgive them.

I advocate: perceive error, appreciatively caution the suspected errant person, listen for their response. If they convince you you erred, apologize and reform. If they accept your caution, apologize, and reform, forgive them. If possible, be patient for a person to receive your caution and respond. Do not accommodate injury or harm to or from anyone.

 I hope to practice, facilitate,& encourage Genesis 1:28-specified responsible-human-independence (RHI). Neither a lesser species, nor a government, nor possible-consequences-of-personal-choice can usurp the human-being’s opportunity to practice civic-integrity in appreciation to the-ineluctable-truth. That's a compact sentence. Let me first clarify just one part: the human-being can& may choose actions that invite negative consequences. People have the autonomy to do harm, inviting constraint.

In a civic culture, I suggest “appreciative caution” rather than the Bible's “rebuke”. I share my opinions hoping to improve them. I do not know the-ineluctable-truth.

Definitions, springing from Genesis 1, Merriam-Webster.com, or cited reference (This is tedious, so skip it if not needed)

·       Appreciative caution: with perceived erroneous plan/action, mutual civic-appreciation empowers human-beings to efficiently suggest& consider caution, without psychological threat to either party. For example, appreciating-speaker can& may assert to appreciating-listener, “I think I perceive harm/injury”, without lessening mutual appreciation. The person who rejects appreciative citizenship invites/nourishes dependency. Here are some possibly applicable words or phrases:

·p    Appreciative inquiry: a psychological system offered at positivepsychology.com/, differs from “appreciative caution”

·         Caution: warning, admonishment

·         Criticize: to express disapproval

·         Constructive criticism: feedback that provides specific, actionable suggestions (indeed.com). I prefer “appreciative suggestion” yet choose "appreciative caution".

·         Correction: amendment, rectification, normalizing/standardizing, rehabilitation

·         Disapprove: unfavorably judge; reject

·        Rebuke: to criticize sharply: reprimand. Archaic: to turn back or keep down: check. [Mathis: Discourage habituating a destructive path. A great act of love.]

·        Reproof: criticism for a fault; rebuke

Note: these definitions may/may-not belong-in the developing civic-glossary posted on promotethepreamble.blogspot.com.

To rebuke a fellow-citizen is foreign to my civic-humility& spiritual-privacy

I take no interest in forgiveness as a barter with divinity and will not yield my responsibility to civic-integrity. In other words, I want to be reliable in my relationships with people. Also, I accept no leadership that accommodates hate among fellow-citizens of the earth. To address hate is to accommodate it. I want to reject hate as a human activity.

Most interpretation in the Bible or commentary, I think erroneously, informs the human-being not to expect a fellow citizen to accept the self-interest to reform when needed. Consider 3 Bible passages and their potentials to fulfill Genesis 1:28. Write an original interpretation, then compare it with both NIV and with the Message Bible.

For now, let me call the Genesis 1:28 interpretations “Nomads’ journal to approach the-ineluctable-truth", after my Sunday school class, Nomads.

Nomads’ journal, adapting NIV Bible and considering the Message Bible   

Leviticus 19:17-19. Do not hate a fellow-citizen in your heart. Caution a suspected offender frankly, immediately, and appreciatively so you will not accommodate harm/injury to or from anyone, including each other. Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against any person, but appreciate them as yourself. Be humble to consequences of personal choice.

Matthew 18: 21-22 Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive an appreciative fellow-citizen who errs against me? Up to seven times?” Jesus answered, “I told you in Genesis 1:28 that human-being can& may independently constrain chaos to the lesser species and to the earth. I will neither usurp nor mislead RHI.

Luke 17:3-4 Be civically alert. If you observe/opine a person-in or planning error, caution them. If they respond, collaborate to mutually approach the-objective-truth if not the-ineluctable-truth and reach agreement or call-in first-responders if necessary. If the cautioned citizen repents& reforms, forgive them. If they habitually cause harm or injury, practice RHI under necessity& justice: pursue constraint. If they present evidence that you are in error, agree, and make the necessary corrections to your person.

NIV Bible

Leviticus 19:17-19. ‘Do not hate a fellow Israelite in your heart. Rebuke your neighbor frankly so you will not share in their guilt. “‘Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.

Matthew 18: 21-22 Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother or sister who sins against me? Up to seven times?” Jesus answered, “I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.

 Luke 17:3-4 So watch yourselves. If your brother or sister sins against you, rebuke them; and if they repent, forgive them. Even if they sin against you seven times in a day and seven times come back to you saying ‘I repent,’ you must forgive them.”

The Message Bible

Leviticus 19:17-19. “Don't secretly hate your neighbor. If you have something against him, get it out into the open; otherwise you are an accomplice in his guilt. Don't seek revenge or carry a grudge against any of your people. Love your neighbor as yourself. I am God.” 

Matthew 18: 21-22 At that point Peter got up the nerve to ask, "Master, how many times do I forgive a brother or sister who hurts me? Seven?" Jesus replied, "Seven! Hardly. Try seventy times seven.”

Luke 17:3-4 "Be alert. If you see your friend going wrong, correct him. If he responds, forgive him. Even if it's personal against you and repeated seven times through the day, and seven times he says, 'I'm sorry, I won't do it again,' forgive him."

Applications to education

Most cultures inculcate popular-doctrine in their youth. Consequently, the youth are destined to either remain adolescents or independently discover self-interest in humility toward consequences of choice: re-educate themselves.

In my fourth quarter century, I serenely-trust my afterdeath to my origins and, possessing the opportunity, choose to practice, facilitate, & encourage civic-integrity among the-citizens-of-the world. I do not think I am alone: many fellow-citizens think-they-can and therefore choose-to independently-aid safety& security-on-Earth.

Epilogue: modern debate

Below, I share an online opinion, “the blessing of rebuke”, and my opposition in yellow highlight, to emphasize that the topic is of current interest.

 https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/embrace-the-blessing-of-rebuke

AUGUST 27, 2014

Embrace the Blessing of Rebuke

Article by 

David Mathis

Executive Editor, desiringGod.org

One of the most loving things anyone can do for you is tell you when you’re wrong. [appreciative rather than loving]

Call it correction, reproof, or rebuke — Paul [an errant civic-advisor] uses all three terms in just four verses in 2 Timothy 3:16–4:2 — but don’t miss what makes it distinctively Christian, and a gift to our souls: It is a great act of love. The kind of rebuke that the Scriptures commend is the kind intended to stop us from continuing on a destructive path. [Mathis presented no reason to label this citizenship “Christian”.]

Watershed of Wisdom

Reproof is a fork in the road for a sinful soul. [Bemusing necessary-justice as "spiritual" ruins its impact.] Will we cringe at correction like a curse, or embrace rebuke as a blessing? One of the great themes in Proverbs is that those who embrace rebuke are wise and walk the path of life, while those who despise reproof find themselves to be fools careening toward death.

The Proverbial warnings against dismissing brotherly correction are staggering. The one who rejects reproof leads others astray (Proverbs 10:17), is stupid (Proverbs 12:1) and a fool (Proverbs 15:5), and despises himself (Proverbs 15:32). “Whoever hates reproof will die” (Proverbs 15:10), and “poverty and disgrace come to him” (Proverbs 13:18). [Christianity lessens OT civic-advice by touting NT afterdeath-rewards. It’s a perhaps-vain hope-to avoid ineluctable death.]

But just as astounding are the promises of blessing to those who embrace rebuke. “Whoever heeds reproof is honored” (Proverbs 13:18) and prudent (Proverbs 15:5). “He who listens to reproof gains intelligence” (Proverbs 15:32), loves knowledge (Proverbs 12:1), will dwell among the wise (Proverbs 15:31), and is on the path of life (Proverbs 10:17) — because “the rod and reproof give wisdom” (Proverbs 29:15) and “the reproofs of discipline are the way of life” (Proverbs 6:23).

To the one who embraces rebuke, God says, “I will pour out my spirit to you” (Proverbs 1:23), but to the one who despises it, “I will laugh at your calamity” (Proverbs 1:25–26). It will be said of those who reject correction, “They shall eat the fruit of their way, and have their fill of their own devices” (Proverbs 1:30–31), and it’s only a matter of time until they themselves will say, “I am at the brink of utter ruin” (Proverbs 5:12–14).

And when ruin comes for the fool who resists reproof, it will be sudden and devastating: “He who is often reproved, yet stiffens his neck, will suddenly be broken beyond healing” (Proverbs 29:1). [However, the Christian perceives exemption through grace --- perceives antinomianism.]

Open the Gift

The wise recognize rebuke as a gift of gold (Proverbs 25:12). It is kindness, and a token of love. “Let a righteous man strike me — it is a kindness; let him rebuke me — it is oil for my head; let my head not refuse it” (Psalm 141:5). [That’s just “OT-rule” misinformation, say some Christians.]

Often it is easier for others in our lives not to say anything, but just let us go merrily on our way down the path of folly and death. But reproof is an act of love, a willingness to own that awkward moment, and perhaps having your counsel thrown back in your face, for the risk of doing someone good. When a spouse or friend or family member or associate rises to the level of such love, we should be profoundly thankful. [That’s true. However, such appreciation should& could be common under Genesis 1:28’s RHI.]

Hear God’s Voice in Your Brother’s

All of us who have in Christ “all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” (Colossians 2:3), and are in our right mind, will want to “listen to advice and accept instruction, that [we] may gain wisdom in the future” (Proverbs 19:20). We’ll not just suffer someone speaking into our lives, but invite them to do so — and when they do, embrace it as a blessing. Even when it’s a rebuke poorly delivered, and the timing and tone are off, and the motivation seems suspect, we’ll want to ransack it for every grain of truth, and then repent, and thank God for the grace of having people in our lives who love us enough to say something. [That seems true, and such appreciation could be common under Genesis 1:28’s RHI.]

 

Not wanting to “despise the Lord’s discipline or be weary of his reproof” (Proverbs 3:11), we’ll ask, How is it that God’s reproof most often comes to us? Answer: in reproof from a brother or sister in Christ. We’ll beware resisting the reproof of a fellow in Jesus, especially when it’s echoed in multiple voices, knowing that likely we would be resisting the very reproof of God. [That seems true, provided Christ is God. However, there’s bemusement in diluting the power of God by attributing it to Christ. Jesus? That's a question that holds my interest as a fellow-citizen if not civic-citizen.]

 

When a brother or sister in Christ goes to the inconvenience to have the unpleasant conversation bringing correction into our lives, we should be floored with thanksgiving. “The Lord reproves him whom he loves” (Proverbs 3:12). Count it as love from your brother, and as God’s channel of his love for you. [Why discourage acceptance of correction from a fellow-citizen?]

Easier Said Than Done

But all of that, of course, is much easier said than done. Deep down in the caverns of our remaining sin, where we can be most callous to true grace in its varied forms, we don’t want to hear any correction. Something wicked in us recoils.

When we hear that “all Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable,” it’s natural to be more excited about it being “for teaching” and “for training in righteousness” than “for reproof” and “for correction” (2 Timothy 3:16). That’s too personal. That touches a nerve.

And forces from without don’t make it any easier. It shouldn’t surprise us that the societal air we breathe is hostile to correction and reproof, even in their most gentle and loving varieties. If humanity isn’t depraved in nature and sinful in practice, then rebuke is no longer a life-saver, but an annoyance. But if we do acknowledge that we are flawed, selfish, and arrogant and regularly sin with our words and actions, then we will learn to see a brother’s rebuke for the tremendous grace that it is. [This paragraph attempts to negate the Genesis 1 assertion female& male-human-being in God’s image --- can& may provide order& prosperity to the lesser species and to Earth.]

Unlock the Power

But however much receiving reproof goes against our native instincts or catches us off our gospel guard in the moment, we have this great hope to grow into: The love of Christ for us is the skeleton key able to unlock for us the power of rebuke. With him in view, the one “who loved me and gave himself for me” (Galatians 2:20), no longer must reproof be an assault on our very foundations and deep sense of worth, but it becomes a fresh opportunity for growth and greater joy.

“With such a Savior to steady our feet, we can embrace rebuke for the blessing that it is.”

It is another grace of the gospel that by the Spirit we can grow skin thick enough to hear any reproof as a pathway to yet even more grace. It is the gospel that gives us the wherewithal for truly leaning into rebuke and receiving its bounty. [I assert that a more direct message is that appreciative-caution is more effective than loving-rebuke.]

Only in Jesus can we find our identity not in being without fault, but in being shown love by God when we’re still sinners and chock-full of faults (Romans 5:8). With such a Savior to steady our feet, we can embrace rebuke for the blessing that it is. [Presenting “Jesus” in competition with “God” seems self-defeating.]

 

David Mathis (@davidcmathis) is executive editor for desiringGod.org and pastor at Cities Church. He is a husband, father of four, and author of Humbled: Welcoming the Uncomfortable Work of God (2021).

Updated on December 13, 2022. PRB.