Ephesians 2, CJB: Is salvation by The God? Are there antinomians?
Guide:
CJB New Testament emphasis in bold (CJB online) or Old
Testament OJB text I emphasize in green; NIV in magenta; OJB in olive.
footnotes to CJB in superscript sky blue and
OJB; Nomads* discussion in yellow; and my
comments in gray. I may
use endnotes to cite outside literature or extensive comment.
*Participative
Sunday-school-class at UBC led by Kenny Tipton. Kenny appreciates opinion in a
continuous search for the ineluctable truth. My evolving statement about
Genesis 1:26-28,31, now from OJB, is at the end of this post. Also, this report
is the first after I discovered Psalm 82, OJB, which in my view affirms that
because I accept Genesis 1’s directive to constrain chaos in my way of living I
am a god facing death. I will post this under a new label, Genesis-1’s Psalm
82.
Chief concerns and possible insights
re Ephesians 2:
1.
Of all the New Testament writers,
Paul is the one I most distrust, all the while, claiming that I do not know the
ineluctable truth.
a.
Paul was not authentic enough to
want to aid a woman for life.
b.
Paul never considered Genesis
1:26-28, 31 as appreciation to The God.
2.
Who can accept “a life of good actions already
prepared by God for us to do” as a personal intention? Being gods facing death
(Psalm 82, OJB), we cannot choose passivity – must oppose “wickedness”.
3.
There are textual problems
between CJB and NIV and between CJB and OJB.
4.
There are too many “Gods” invoked
in the text.
What Paul’s text seems to say:
V1 Anyone
who does not pursue and practice good behavior is dead but may reform.
V3 Sex is a major
distraction.
V4 But the Messiah
redeemed us by God’s mercy, love, and grace.
V8 Even your trust
and commitment is God’s gift.
V10 Since we are
Messiah Yeshua’s group, our life of good actions is not our intention. I do not
accept this idea: I choose good behavior, because I oppose wickedness.
V12 The
uncircumcised, before the Messiah, were without Israel’s God.
V13-V16 The
Semitic-speaking people who left Ur to resist killing humans for blood for god
worship nevertheless believed that blood was necessary for atonement, so killed
animals and birds. Israel continued the belief until Rome destroyed the Second
Temple in CE 70, after which Israel turned to obedience, continually
discovered. Belief in a Messiah hung on a stake is not attractive to me, and
that belief has increased the world’s division, these 2025 years later. Paul’s
“single new humanity” is a dream, I think unattainable through blood sacrifice,
whether by worship or by war.
V17 CJB slights its
own footnote: Isaiah 57:19, NIV slights
both OJB and CJB, which claim to those nearby “I will heal him”.
V19 Messiah, one
Spirit, and the Father may leap to “Trinity”.
V20-22 After
“Messiah” why “the Lord” then “for God”?
The CJB text follows,
with comments:
2:1 You used to be dead because of your sins and
acts of disobedience transgressions
and sins. 2 You walked in the ways of
the ‘olam hazeh this world and obeyed the Ruler of the Powers of the Air, who
is still at work among the disobedient. 3 Indeed,
we all once lived this way — we followed the passions of our old nature flesh and obeyed the
wishes of our old nature desires
and our own thoughts. In our natural condition we were headed for deserving of God’s
wrath, just like everyone else.
4 But God is so rich in mercy and loves us with such intense love 5 that,
even when we were dead because of our acts of disobedience, he brought us to
life along with the Messiah Christ
— it is by grace that you have
been delivered. 6 That is, God raised us up
with the Messiah Yeshua Christ Jesus and seated us with him
in heaven, 7 in order to exhibit in the ages to
come how infinitely rich is his grace, how great is his kindness toward us who
are united with the Messiah Yeshua. 8 For you have
been delivered by grace through trusting faith, and even this is not your accomplishment but God’s gift. 9 You
were not delivered by your own actions; therefore no one should boast. [If a person cannot boast about choices
in life, how can they imagine effecting a good afterdeath?] 10 For
we are of God’s making, created in union with the Messiah Yeshua for a life of good actions already prepared by God for
us to do. [Let’s
all be passive and let Paul’s plan play out! Not me: I trust Yeshua’s influence
to necessary goodness, not Paul the boastful “self-appointed apostle to the
pagans”.]
11 Therefore, remember your former state: you
Gentiles by birth — called the Uncircumcised by those who, merely because of an
operation on their flesh, are called the Circumcised (which is done in the body by human
hands) — 12 at
that time had no Messiah. You were estranged from the national life of Isra’el.
You were foreigners to the covenants embodying God’s promise. You were in this
world without hope and without God in the world. [Paul via NIV suggests Israel was/could limit God’s access to
humankind: not possible.]
13 But now, you who were once far off have been
brought near through the shedding of the Messiah’s blood. 14 For
he himself is our shalom peace— he has made us both one and has broken
down the m’chitzah barrier which divided us 15 by
destroying in his own body the enmity occasioned by the Torah, with
its commands set forth in the form of ordinances regulations. He did this in order to create in
union with himself from the two
groups a single new humanity
and thus make shalom, 16 and in order
to reconcile to God both in a single body by being executed on a stake the cross as a criminal
and thus in himself killing that enmity hostility. [So far, Pauline Christianity increased division rather
than aided “a single new humanity”.]
17 Also, when he came, he announced as Good
News shalom to you far off and shalom to
those nearby I will heal him,[Isaiah
57:19, “ I create the [repentant]
fruit of the lips; Shalom, shalom to him that is far off, and to him that is
near, saith Hashem; and I will heal him.”] [Notice
the V17 disagreement with its own footnote. Both OJB and CJB at Isaiah 57:19
say about the circumcised “I will heal him”.
NIV lumps circumcised and uncircumcised together.]
18 news
that through him we both have access in one Spirit to the Father. [The Trinity.]
19 So then, you are no longer foreigners and
strangers. On the contrary, you are fellow-citizens with God’s people and
members of God’s family household. 20 You
have been built on the foundation of the emissaries and the prophets, with the
cornerstone being Yeshua the Messiah himself. 21 In
union with him the whole building is held together, and it is growing into a holy
temple in union with the Lord. 22 Yes, in union
with him, you yourselves are being built together into a spiritual
dwelling-place for God! [In
light of the trinity in V 18, why “the Lord” in V 21 and “for God” in V 22?]
[Genesis
1:26-28, 31 OJB:
I
read to consider and apply perhaps 5500 year old Sumerian political philosophy,
religiously referenced by Semite (pre-Israel) scribes of 3900 years ago, in
Genesis 1:26-28, 31, in my paraphrase and extension to law:
Female-and-male-human-being may and can
choose to practice the power, the authority, and the responsibility
to pursue necessary goodness and constrain wickedness on earth. Civic
citizens may and can use the rule of law to develop statutory justice. And that
is good.
Political
and religious philosopher Yeshua affirmed Genesis 1:26-28, 31, contributing
ideas in each Matthew 18:18 (no peace-power above humankind), Matthew 19:3-8
(mutual spousal-loyalty), Matthew 5:48 (in good behavior, pursue personal
perfection, which also affirms Deuteronomy 18:13), Matthew 19:4-6 (don’t
divide/lessen goodness), John 10:34 (non-wicked humans are gods -- facing
death, as in Psalm 82:1-7), and in other direct dialogue, such as “go and sin
no more”. Psalm 82 says nothing about resurrection.
Discussion
I think Genesis 1:26-28, 31 informs humankind to flourish in
necessary goodness rather than accommodate badness and allow evil.
Quoting OJB below,
And G-d said, Let Us make
man in Our tzelem, after Our demut: and let them have dominion over the fish of
the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the
earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon ha’aretz (the earth).
So G-d created humankind in
His own tzelem, in the tzelem Elohim (image of G-d) created He him; zachar
(male) and nekevah (female) created He them.
And G-d blessed them, and
G-d said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue
it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air,
and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. See note, below.
Accepting
the power, the authority, and the responsibility to rule on earth is human
being (verb). Reliable human-beings choose necessary goodness to actual reality.
The God judges the goodness in V 31:
And G-d saw every thing that He had made, and, behold, it
was tov me’od (very good).
Note: OJB uses “Elohim” in Genesis 1 and 2,
excepting “G-d” in 1:24-31. V 27 seems to equate the two
entities. Septuagint uses “ὁ θεὸς”, or God throughout Genesis 1.
I use “The God, or whatever constrains human choice”, hoping to express
humility to whatever The God is.
Since monotheism is a human construct, I use the phrase, “The God, whatever it may be”, to express objection to any doctrinal God yet reserve humility to ineluctable evidence and remaining unknowns about what constrains the consequences of human choices.]